This really is a good example essay on outcomes of The Patriot Act.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are the ones associated with authors and don’t necessarily reflect the views of LawTeacher.

The USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act) was established after 11, 2001 (9/11) when terrorists attacked the United States september.

The Patriot Act has raised many concerns about whether it infringes from the civil liberties of those with this nation. Looking back ever sold, our past presidents developed laws which were the stone that is stepping the ideas that created the Patriot Act. The government’s job is to protect the people, but it has a bigger job that is to guard the world. This has raised many issues involving the Patriot Act and whether or not it really is more detrimental to us than it is helpful. The american people should be concerned with how much power our government has when developing laws governing our civil liberties in relation to the Patriot Act and how it deprives those accused under it of Constitutional rights.

On 11, 2001 the United States (US) experienced the unthinkable when terrorists attacked the country on its own soil september. This was a serious eye opener or should I say reality search for the united states. The united states has many of the very counter that is sophisticated on earth but was struggling to prevent such a tragedy. Why didn’t it is seen by them coming? Plenty of thing would be today that is different that question could half been answered ahead of 9/11.

<

This act was compiled from two documents, the Provide Appropriate Tools expected to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (PATRIOT) from the homely house of Representatives (House) and the Uniting and Strengthening American (USA) Act through the Senate, was merged together creating the Patriot Act. According to Lemieux, previous developed laws created by previous presidents to solve conflicts were just like the Patriot Act they just had different names Lemieux, M. (n.d.). Reputation for the united states Patriot Act. Retrieved 9, 2011, from http://www.constitutiondenied.com/Media/History-Patriot-Act.pdf april. The Aliens and Sedition Act of 1798 was developed during the war with France because the US was afraid when it comes to country and the people and wanted to ensure that the enemy failed to sleep amongst us. With this specific power the president surely could have anyone that was thought to be a threat to the government would be arrested and deported. Through the Civil War the president suspended Habeas Corpus for the safety advantages of the country, giving the federal government the power to imprison someone without sufficient evidence. During World War II, the President ordered over 10,000 American citizens which had not shown any disloyalty to your united states of america into confinement camps since they were of Japanese descent Lemieux, M. (n.d.). Reputation for the USA Patriot Act. Retrieved 9, 2011, from http://www.constitutiondenied.com/Media/History-Patriot-Act.pdf april. These are the stone that is stepping the introduction of the Patriot Act.

The Patriot Act has been around since as a response to your tragic events of 9/11. The balance that would turned out to be known as the Patriot Act was introduced to Congress just days after 9/11. It had been revised as a result of concerns from many congressmen that the bill allowed for too broad of a scope of capacity to federal authorities. Eventually after the bill was revised and reintroduced, Congress passed it with little to no opposition on 26, 2001 october. Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI), would up being the only senator to vote up against the Patriot Act. Although the Patriot Act did not come into existence until after 9/11, it can have roots in earlier legislation. On 25, 1996, President Clinton signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act into law april. The bill with this law was introduced following the Oklahoma City Bombing. The most important provision associated with act managed to make it illegal to deliver “material support” to your organization banned because of the State Department. The balance was greatly criticized by Republicans for granting too much power to authorities. The balance needed to undergo major modifications before it absolutely was passed in 1996. The bill that wound up becoming law was said to be a “watered down version” for the original that President Clinton wanted passed. Strangely enough, it was this act which was broadened and revamped to produce the Patriot Act (Creative Commons, n.d.).

Since becoming law, the Patriot Act has been highly criticized if you are extremely broad and too open for interpretation. In 2004, a judge ruled that elements of the Patriot Act were unconstitutional since they were too vague and in violation regarding the First and Fifth Amendments. Another criticism for the Patriot Act is the fact that it will not guarantee oversight that is enough ensure that the ones that are given power by the act do not misuse it. On March 9, 2006 President Bush signed the Patriot Act Reauthorization, but attached a statement that is signing which he said which he would ignore specific mandates written in the balance that would give more judicial and Congressional oversight to agencies authorized use of the act. The Attorney General at the time, requesting to have the administration rescind the signing statement since they do not have force of law in late March, letters were written to Alberto Gonzales. In those letters, they cited Article 1, Section 7 of this Constitution which states that ‘Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented into the President of this United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall send it back.’ Alberto Gonzales and President Bush both ignored the letters rather than responded. Their argument was that the president could not change legislation that were passed by Congress and say which he did not agree with that he would ignore part of it. On 10, 2007, an appeals court upheld the 2004 ruling that parts of the Patriot Act were unconstitutional december. When you look at the ruling, the court stated that a statute must provide for a person of average intelligence to help you to read through and comprehend the law. They unearthed that certain components of the act were too vague. They determined that in the event that law was worded in a manner that the typical average person could not understand, then your person with average skills would not know if these were committing a crime (Creative Commons, n.d.).

While many genuinely believe that our terrorist threat from other countries is excellent, additionally there is the fear of terrorist attacks regarding the US by its very own citizens. The Oklahoma City Bombing is a tragic example. In many cases, there clearly was a necessity for the government to suspect an American citizen and do surveillance to safeguard the united states from another such tragedy. The federal government has been espionage that is doing for extended than many people think. It is really not a practice that is new but with the technology we have today, it really is easier for authorities to get intelligence. Even though they will have this technology at their disposal that doesn’t imply that the Constitution could be ignored within the true name of protecting the united states.

One example associated with Patriot Act getting used this kind of a way is within the case of Jose Padilla.

He was a Puerto Rican born citizen who later inside the life changed into Islam. He traveled through the entire Middle East and allegedly plotted with al Qaeda terrorists to detonate a bomb” that is“dirty a US city. As soon he was detained as he stepped off a plane in the United States. The Bush Administration claimed though he was an American citizen because he had been deemed an “enemy combatant” by the president that he could be detained even. He had been then held in a brig that is military three . 5 years and was allegedly subjected to torture as a result of US officials trying to elicit information from him. At that time, he had been not faced with any crimes though it was said there clearly was overwhelming evidence against him. He had been also cut off from all communication along with his family and attorney (Martinez, 2007).